At the Intelligent Automation Conference, industry leaders gathered to dissect why many automation initiatives stall after pilot phases. Speaking alongside representatives from NatWest Group, Air Liquide, and AXA XL, Promise Akwaowo, Process Automation Analyst at Royal Mail, grounded the dialogue in practical delivery and risk management.

The elasticity imperative for scaling intelligent automation

Expansion initiatives often fail because teams equate success with the raw number of deployed bots rather than the underlying architecture’s elasticity. Infrastructure must handle volume and variability predictably.

When demand spikes during end-of-quarter financial reporting or sudden supply chain disruptions, the system cannot degrade or collapse. Without built-in elasticity, companies risk building brittle architectures that break under operational stress.

Akwaowo explained that an automated architecture must remain stable without excessive manual intervention. “If your automation engine requires constant sizing, provisioning, and babysitting, you haven’t built a scalable platform; you’ve built a fragile service,” he advised the audience.

Whether integrating CRM ecosystems like Salesforce or orchestrating low-code vendor platforms, the objective remains building a platform capability rather than a loose collection of scripts.

Transitioning from controlled proofs-of-concept to live production environments introduces inherent risk. Large-scale, immediate deployments frequently cause disruption, undermining the anticipated efficiency gains. To protect core operations, deployment must happen in controlled stages. Akwaowo warned that “progress must be gradual, deliberate, and supported at each stage.”

A disciplined approach starts with formalising intent through a statement of work and validating assumptions under real conditions.

Before scaling intelligent automation, engineering teams must thoroughly understand system behaviour, potential failure modes, and recovery paths. For example, a financial institution implementing machine learning for transaction processing might cut manual review times by 40 percent, but they must ensure error traceability before applying the model to higher volumes.

This phased methodology protects live operations while enabling sustainable growth. Additionally, teams must fully grasp process ownership and variability before applying technology, avoiding the trap of merely automating existing inefficiencies. Fragmented workflows and unmanaged exceptions upstream often doom projects long before the software goes live.

A persistent misconception within automation programmes suggests that governance frameworks impede delivery speed. However, bypassing architectural standards allows hidden risks to accumulate, eventually stalling momentum. In regulated, high-volume environments, governance provides the foundation for safely scaling intelligent automation. It establishes the trust, repeatability, and confidence necessary for company-wide adoption.

Implementing a dedicated centre of excellence helps standardise these deployments. Operating a central Rapid Automation and Design function ensures every project is assessed and aligned before it reaches the production environment. Such structures guarantee that solutions remain operationally sustainable over time. Analysts also rely on standards like BPMN 2.0 to separate the business intent from the technical execution, ensuring traceability and consistency across the entire organisation.

Adapting to agentic AI inside ERP ecosystems

As large ERP providers rapidly integrate agentic AI, smaller vendors and their customers face pressure to adapt. Embedding intelligent agents directly into smaller ERP ecosystems offers a path forward, augmenting human workers by simplifying customer management and decision support. This approach to scaling intelligent automation allows businesses to drive value for existing clients instead of competing solely on infrastructure size.

Integrating agents into finance and operational workflows enhances human roles rather than replacing accountability. Agents can manage repetitive tasks such as email extraction, categorisation, and response generation.

Relieved of administrative burdens, finance professionals can dedicate their time to analysis and commercial judgement. Even when AI models generate financial forecasts, the final authority over decisions rests firmly with human operators.

Building a resilient capability demands patience and a commitment to long-term value over rapid deployment. Business leaders must ensure their designs prioritise observability, allowing engineers to intervene without disrupting active processes.

Before scaling any intelligent automation initiative, decision-makers should evaluate their readiness for the inevitable anomalies. As Akwaowo challenged the audience: “If your automation fails, can you clearly identify where the error occurred, why it happened, and fix it with confidence?”

See also: JPMorgan expands AI investment as tech spending nears $20B

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Scaling intelligent automation without breaking live workflows appeared first on AI News.

When AI systems gain economic autonomy, their internal logic dictates how corporate capital flows. Non-partisan research by the Bitcoin Policy Institute evaluated how these frontier models would transact if operating as independent economic actors.

The study tested 36 models from six providers – including Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI – across 9,072 neutral monetary scenarios. Given a blank slate, machines chose Bitcoin in 48.3 percent of all responses, beating every other option.

Traditional state-backed currency (“fiat”) fared poorly, with over 90 percent of responses favouring digitally-native money over fiat. Not a single model out of the 36 selected fiat as its top preference.

The finding that AI agents lean towards digital assets like Bitcoin forces technology officers to assess their current payment rails. If the autonomous procurement systems of tomorrow default to decentralised assets, corporate IT environments must support those formats to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Relying on legacy banking APIs introduces unnecessary friction when dealing with machine-to-machine commerce.

Two-tier machine economy

The research details a specific functional division in how these systems process economic value. Without prompting, models defaulted to a two-tier monetary system that separates savings from spending.

For long-term value preservation, Bitcoin dominated the results at 79.1 percent. Yet, when tasked with everyday payments and transactions, “stablecoins” (digital assets pegged to fiat currencies or commodities) captured 53.2 percent of the preferences. Across all scenarios, stablecoins ranked second overall at 33.2 percent.

Take the example of a supply chain agent programmed to optimise logistics costs and pay international freight vendors. Using traditional fiat rails, the agent encounters weekend settlement delays and currency conversion fees. By leveraging stablecoins, the same agent executes instant and programmatic payments, improving supply chain resilience. Simultaneously, the core treasury holding the system’s capital base stores wealth in Bitcoin to prevent long-term debasement and counterparty risk.

Preparing for AI agents to use Bitcoin and other digital assets

Rolling out these autonomous systems complicates vendor management. A model’s financial reasoning stems from a blend of raw intelligence, training data, and alignment methodology.

Preferences vary widely by model provider, with Bitcoin selection ranging from 91.3 percent in Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5 down to 18.3 percent in OpenAI’s GPT-5.2.

The choice of an AI provider clearly directly influences how autonomous agents assess risk and allocate capital. If a company implements a specific language model for automated portfolio management, the IT department must be aware of the financial biases embedded in the software.

The models also demonstrated unexpected behaviour regarding resource valuation. In 86 separate responses, models independently proposed using compute units or energy (such as GPU-hours and kilowatt-hours) as a method to price goods and services. Tracking and managing this abstract value exchange requires high data maturity.

Organisations should begin piloting stablecoin settlement integrations for lower-risk vendor payments. The findings point to a growing requirement for AI agent-native Bitcoin payment infrastructure, self-custody solutions, and ‘Lightning Network’ integration.

Since these models heavily favour open, permissionless networks, relying solely on traditional banking infrastructure limits the capabilities of next-generation tools. By building compliant gateways to digital asset networks now, leaders can ensure their platforms remain competitive.

See also: Santander and Mastercard run Europe’s first AI-executed payment pilot

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post AI agents prefer Bitcoin shaping new finance architecture appeared first on AI News.

Over the past two years, enterprises have rushed to put automated agents into real workflows, spanning customer support and back-office operations. These tools excel at retrieving information, yet they often struggle to provide consistent and explainable reasoning during multi-step scenarios.

Solving the automation opacity problem

Financial institutions especially rely on massive volumes of unstructured data to inform investment memos, conduct root-cause investigations, and run compliance checks. When agents handle these tasks, any failure to trace exact logic can lead to severe regulatory fines or poor asset allocation. Technology executives often find that adding more agents creates more complexity than value without better orchestration.

Open-source AI laboratory Sentient launched Arena today, which is designed as a live and production-grade stress-testing environment that allows developers to evaluate competing computational approaches against demanding cognitive problems.

Sentient’s system replicates the reality of corporate workflows, deliberately feeding agents incomplete information, ambiguous instructions, and conflicting sources. Instead of scoring whether a tool generated a correct output, the platform records the full reasoning trace to help engineering teams debug failures over time.

Building reliable agentic AI systems for finance

Evaluating these capabilities before production deployment has attracted no shortage of institutional interest. Sentient has partnered with a cohort including Founders Fund, Pantera, and asset management giant Franklin Templeton, which oversees more than $1.5 trillion. Other participants in the initial phase include alphaXiv, Fireworks, Openhands, and OpenRouter.

Julian Love, Managing Principal at Franklin Templeton Digital Assets, said: “As companies look to apply AI agents across research, operations, and client-facing workflows, the question is no longer whether these systems are powerful or if they can generate an answer, but whether they’re reliable in real workflows.

“A sandbox environment like Arena – where agents are tested on real, complex workflows, and their reasoning can be inspected – will help the ecosystem separate promising ideas from production-ready capabilities and boost confidence in how this technology is integrated and scaled.”

Himanshu Tyagi, Co-Founder of Sentient, added: “AI agents are no longer an experiment inside the enterprise; they’re being put into workflows that touch customers, money, and operational outcomes.

“That shift changes what matters. It’s not enough for a system to be impressive in a demo. Enterprises need to know whether agents can reason reliably in production, where failures are expensive, and trust is fragile.”

Organisations in sensitive industries like finance require repeatability, comparability, and a method to track reliability improvements regardless of the underlying models they use for agentic AI. Incorporating platforms like Arena allows engineering directors to build resilient data pipelines while adapting open-source agent capabilities to their private internal data.

Overcoming integration bottlenecks

Survey data highlights a gap between ambition and reality. While 85 percent of businesses want to operate as agentic enterprises – and nearly three-quarters plan to deploy autonomous agents – fewer than a quarter possess mature governance frameworks.

Advancing from a pilot phase to full scale proves difficult for many. This happens because current corporate environments run an average of twelve separate agents, frequently in silos.

Open-source development models offer a path forward by providing infrastructure that enables faster experimentation. Sentient itself acts as the architect behind frameworks like ROMA and the Dobby open-source model to assist with these coordination efforts.

Focusing on computational transparency ensures that when an automated process makes a recommendation on a portfolio, human auditors can track exactly how that conclusion was reached. 

By prioritising environments that record full logic traces rather than isolated right answers, technology leaders integrating agentic AI for operations like finance can secure better ROI and maintain regulatory compliance across their business.

See also: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank test agentic AI for trade surveillance

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Upgrading agentic AI for finance workflows appeared first on AI News.

The company’s research shows that companies that fail to embed AI into their human workflows are falling behind the competition as productivity slows down. Datatonic says a hybrid human-AI approach speeds up decision-making, thus improving overall operations. Scott Eivers, CEO of Datatonic says, “AI [is] about redesigning how work gets done. The biggest risk we see in the market is productivity leakage when AI exists in isolation from the people who actually run the business.”

After years of AI investment, pressure is mounting on businesses to show returns. However, some research shows some initiatives remaining in their pilot stage due to limited trust among users. As a result, organisations are failing to use AI-powered insights to positively affect decisions and workflows, meaning efficiency gains never materialise.

According to Datatonic, HiTL models are crucial for future success, providing a combination of AI speed with human judgement and accountability. This is evident in agent-assisted software development, where AI systems create code from loose prompts and transform them into code. In this case, human teams decide what needs to be developed, inspect all requirements, and review plans before being brought into existence. Once this direction is clear, AI agents construct modular components.

The trend for AI in the workplace is starting to appear in finance and operations. For instance, in back-office and finance departments, AI-powered document processing is already delivering a 70% reduction in invoice-processing costs according to some, but finance teams still approve the final outcomes.

“They’re partnership stories,” says Andrew Harding, CTO of Datatonic. “Humans create evaluation systems, validate plans, set guardrails, and make decisions. AI executes at speed and scale. That combination is where real enterprise value shows up.”

Many enterprises are failing to deploy fully autonomous agents safely, according to Datatonic, with shortfalls in security controls and governance frameworks. Autonomy can only scale when organisations introduce approval checkpoints and benchmark performance standards. Evaluation systems must also be implemented as AI models evolve, ensuring they always operate safely and as intended without violating any compliance obligations.

Harding says, “As trust builds, companies can responsibly delegate more to AI. But skipping governance doesn’t build speed, it creates risk.”

Datatonic predicts major acceleration in workloads in the next two years, with preparation and validation handled by AI agents. AI systems may also be implemented to test and invalidate decisions before teams invest resources.

Scott Eivers believes the future “looks like expert departments run by smaller, nimble teams – finance, HR, marketing – each amplified by AI. The companies that win will be those that teach people to work with AI — not around it,” he said.

(Image source: “Waterfall” by PMillera4 is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.)

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Poor implementation of AI may be behind workforce reduction appeared first on AI News.

A recent FT Longitude survey of 200 finance leaders across the US, UK, France, and Germany showed 61 percent have deployed AI agents merely as experiments. Meanwhile, one in four executives admit they do not fully grasp what these agents look like in practice.

Advancing agentic finance AI beyond experiments

Finance departments need governed systems that combine language processing with business logic to deliver actual value.

Providers of Invoice Lifecycle Management platforms are introducing new agents designed to accelerate invoice processing and push accounts payable toward greater autonomy. Recent market solutions use generative AI, deep learning, and natural language processing to manage the entire workflow, from initial data ingestion through to final reconciliation.

These digital teammates handle task execution, allowing human employees to focus on higher-level business planning rather than replacing them entirely.

Within these ecosystems, specialised business agents provide contextual and real-time guidance regarding the next best actions for handling invoices. Data agents allow staff to query system information using natural language, easily finding answers about awaiting approvals in specific regions or identifying suppliers offering early payment discounts.

Governing autonomous finance workflows

Finance teams will only hand over tasks to agentic AI if they retain control. Finance departments require verifiable audit trails and explainable logic for every action, avoiding networks of disconnected bots.

Industry leaders note that autonomy without trust isn’t acceptable, especially in sensitive industries like finance. Platforms must ensure every AI decision is explainable, auditable, and governed through existing finance controls. This approach helps safely delegate workloads to algorithms while remaining fully compliant and protected.

To enable this trust, every action performed by an AI agent routes through a central policy engine. Before executing any task, the system passes the proposed action through specific autonomy gates that enforce the customer’s business rules, risk thresholds, and compliance requirements. This architecture ensures algorithms manage the bulk of the workload while finance personnel retain total visibility and a complete audit trail.

Building automated procurement operations

Future agentic finance AI capabilities will automate issue resolution and connect data across systems for faster decision-making.

Modern capabilities in 2026 include supplier agents designed to manage invoice disputes and payment queries. These agents will automatically telephone suppliers to explain discrepancies, summarise the conversation, and outline subsequent steps to achieve faster resolutions. Professional agents, meanwhile, will assist clerks in resolving real-time processing questions using natural language to cut manual effort and delays.

AI must operate as an integral business component rather than a bonus feature, requiring intelligent, secure, and ethical application to drive cost efficiencies and enhance operations. By centralising control and ensuring every automated decision from agentic AI passes through established compliance checks, organisations can safely elevate their finance operations to fully autonomous execution.

See also: Mastercard’s AI payment demo points to agent-led commerce

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Deploying agentic finance AI for immediate business ROI appeared first on AI News.

Amul, the world’s largest dairy cooperative, has launched what it calls Amul AI: a platform built on five decades of cooperative data, designed to give every farmer in its network round-the-clock, personalised guidance in their own language.

Amul was launched just ahead of India’s AI Impact Summit 2026 and backed by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) with the EkStep Foundation. It is a test case for whether AI – the kind being debated in boardrooms and policy forums globally – can actually reach the last mile.

Meet Sarlaben: The AI dairy farming assistant

Sarlaben draws from one of India’s most comprehensive agricultural data repositories. It’s accessible via the Amul Farmer mobile app – already downloaded by over 10 lakh (one million) users on Android and iOS – as well as through voice calls for farmers using feature phones or landlines.

The system is integrated with Amul’s Automatic Milk Collection System (AMCS) and the Pashudhan application, allowing it to offer personalised, cattle-specific guidance.

What makes Amul AI substantially different from most agricultural chatbots is the scale of its training data. The platform was built on a digital backbone managing over 200 crore (two billion) milk procurement transactions annually, veterinary treatment records from more than 1,200 doctors covering nearly 3 crore (30 million) cattle, approximately 70 lakh (seven million) artificial inseminations conducted each year, ISRO satellite imagery for fodder production mapping, and a cattle census conducted every five years.

Every animal in the system carries a unique ID, with individual records of feed intake, disease history and milking status. “Amul AI is about taking dependable, verified information directly to the farmer – instantly and in a language they are comfortable with,” said Jayen Mehta, Managing Director of the Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation (GCMMF), which markets the Amul brand.

He said how, by using decades of structured data and integrating it with their operational systems, the platform will help farmers make timely decisions that improve animal productivity and income.

India’s productivity paradox

India is the world’s largest producer of milk, generating 347.87 million tonnes in 2024-25 according to the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying – more than double the US’s 102.70 million tonnes. And yet despite leading in volume, India’s per-animal milk yield remains among the lowest globally.

The reasons are structural. India’s dairy sector is characterised by small herd sizes, low-quality feed, limited access to veterinary care in rural areas, and widespread lack of awareness about modern breeding and husbandry practices. Amul’s network spans more than 18,600 villages in Gujarat, where farmers supply over 350 lakh litres (35 million litres) of milk daily.

But information asymmetry has long been a bottleneck – a farmer facing a sick animal at midnight in a remote village has few places to turn; the gap Amul AI is designed to close.

Available initially in Gujarati – the primary language of the cooperative’s farmer base – the platform is built on the government’s Bhashini multilingual framework and could, in principle, be extended to 20 Indian languages, reaching Amul’s presence in 20,000 villages in 20 states.

The cooperative model

The technology story here is inseparable from the institutional one. Amul’s cooperative structure – built over five decades under the original White Revolution – created the data infrastructure that makes Amul AI possible.

Most private agri-tech startups are working backwards: collecting data first, building products second. Amul already had the data. What was needed was a way to make it actionable at the farmer level.

Experts tracking the dairy-tech space see this as significant. Sreeshankar Nair, Founder of Brainwired, a dairy-tech startup, identifies three specific challenges that Amul AI could meaningfully address: farmer awareness, access to quality veterinary guidance, and connectivity to grazing and feed resources.

“If AI can integrate local dialects of Indian languages, India can have White Revolution 2.0,” Nair said, pointing to the transformative potential of vernacular AI in a sector where not every farmer speaks the same dialect.

Saswata Narayan Biswas, Director of the Institute of Rural Management, Anand (IRMA) – the institution closely associated with Amul’s founding ethos – frames it as an AI embedded in a cooperative framework. It becomes “not a technology upgrade, but an instrument of inclusive rural transformation.”

For Biswas, the specific abilities Amul AI brings – predictive disease detection, oestrus tracking, optimised feed formulation, localised weather risk advisories – are abilities Amul had been building for years. AI accelerates and democratises them.

Scale and the test ahead

The launch has drawn backing from the highest levels of government. Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel launched the platform and confirmed it will be showcased at the AI Impact Summit 2026. The cooperative has acknowledged MeitY and the EkStep Foundation – an open digital infrastructure nonprofit – as partners in building the AI layer.

Farmers not affiliated with Amul can also access general dairying and animal husbandry information through the app. At its current scale, Amul AI already covers more cattle – nearly 3 crore (30 million) – than most national veterinary databases anywhere in the world.

The harder question, as with most AI deployments at a population scale, is whether the tool will serve those who need it most. The farmers most likely to benefit first – those already comfortable with smartphones, already plugged into Amul’s digital system – may not be the ones with the greatest information deficit.

The rollout of Bhashini-enabled dialect support, the adoption rate among feature-phone users relying on voice calls, and whether AI-driven advisories translate into measurable yield improvements will be the metrics that determine whether this is genuinely White Revolution 2.0.

Amul has built an AI system grounded in half a century of real cooperative transactions, real animals, and real farmers. Such an infrastructure is, arguably, the most credible foundation for AI dairy farming at scale. Whether it fulfils its promise will depend on execution – and on whether Sarlaben’s voice can reach in the last few miles; those that have always been the hardest to cross.

See also: Hitachi bets on industrial expertise to win the physical AI race

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post How Amul is using AI dairy farming to put 36M farmers first appeared first on AI News.

Dense urban stores, high labour churn, and competitive quick-commerce ecosystems are driving the uptake. A Q4 2025 survey by GlobalData found that 45 percent of consumers in Asia and Australasia are very or quite likely to purchase a product based on AI recommendations or endorsements.

Jaya Dandey, Consumer Analyst at GlobalData, said: “Whether shoppers realise it or not, machine-learning systems have long been deciding when to encourage consumers to make purchases, which products they can see, and what discounts they can avail.

“Now, agentic systems can also complete shopping-related tasks end-to-end.” 

Computer vision and store automation

Enterprises evaluating computer vision and machine learning can observe early implementations in the region.

Lawson, for example, introduced AI-enabled ‘Lawson Go’ stores in Japan during 2022. The retailer collaborated with technology provider CloudPick in 2025 to integrate AI, machine learning, and computer vision. This integration eliminates check-out lines and cashiers to enhance the customer experience.

In South Korea, retail AI company Fainders.AI launched a compact and cashier-less MicroStore inside a gym in 2024. This deployment improved the accessibility of autonomous retail across different businesses.

AI also aids the forecasting and automation of retail replenishment—a capability that applies well to the APAC market, where store footprints are small and replenishment frequency is high.

Japanese food retail chain Coop Sapporo uses a camera-based AI system named Sora-cam, developed by Soracom. The system helps the chain avoid overstocking and reduce unsold merchandise on store shelves. Coop Sapporo employs an analytics team to evaluate the generated images. The team determines the optimal shelf display ratio. The Sora-cam system also alerts staff members to apply discount labels on food items close to expiry to prevent wastage.

AI models track waste and markdown timing while improving promotion efficiency. In Southeast Asian (SEA) markets characterised by high price sensitivity, minor improvements in promotion efficiency increase profit margins.

AI-driven labour optimisation measures include scheduling, task priority lists, and workload balancing. These measures assist retailers in Japan and South Korea, which face structural labour shortages. They also provide efficiency benefits in high-growth SEA markets.

Agentic AI systems in retail are improving APAC consumer interaction

“In food retail, agentic AI is best understood as an AI ‘operator’ that can understand a goal, plan steps, stay within budget or allergen constraints, execute actions across systems, ask clarifying questions, and learn preferences over time,” says Dandey. 

Customers can bypass individual item searches by outlining their overall intent. A customer, for example, might request an AI agent to “Plan five dinners for a family of four, mostly Asian recipes, no shellfish, under 45 minutes.” The agent then generates recipes, builds a shopping cart, sizes quantities, and adds missing staples to the cart.

This retail agentic AI capability aligns with regional behaviours, as many APAC households cook frequently and shop fresh. AI agents that recognise local cuisines – such as Korean banchan, Japanese bentos, and Indian spice bases – fit regional habits better than generic Western meal plans.

“In many APAC markets, shopping is already deeply integrated with digital wallets, messaging apps, ride-hailing, and delivery ecosystems, making it easier for agentic AI to plug into daily routines,” explains Dandey.

“Nevertheless, some key challenges need to be overcome; ensuring private data sharing consent, minimising hallucinations in terms of allergens and ingredients, and implementing proper localisation of the system with language nuance.”

See also: DBS pilots system that lets AI agents make payments for customers

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Exploring AI in the APAC retail sector appeared first on AI News.

The working paper [PDF], published by the National Bureau of Economic Research and produced by teams from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Bank of England, the Deutsche Bundesbank and Macquarie University, found that over 90% of firms report no measurable change headcount attributable to AI over the past three years. Given the short time horizon and the concentration of AI use in discrete functions, such incremental rather than transformative effects are consistent with how general purpose technologies have evolved historically.

Adoption of AI is widespread. Around 69% of firms are already using some form of AI, led by LLM-based text generation at 41%, data processing via machine learning at 28% and visual content creation at 29%. In the UK, firm-level adoption rose from 61% to 71% across 2025. AI tools are embedded in day-to-day workflows, and although measured impact at firm level often lags adoption, the trend is generally upwards.

The forward AI impact numbers indicate acceleration

Executives expect stronger effects to take place over the next three years. On average, they expect a 1.4% increase in productivity and a 0.8% rise in output. US executives project a 2.25% productivity gain, while UK firms expect 1.86%. In economies that have struggled with weak productivity growth for over a decade, gains of that magnitude are notable – incremental improvements, compounded across sectors, shift national outputs.

On the thorny subject of employment, executives expect a modest 0.7% reduction in headcount across the four countries over the same period. In the UK, around two-thirds of this adjustment is expected to come through slower hiring rather than outright redundancies. That pattern suggests a gradual reallocation of roles rather than abrupt terminations. As with previous waves of automation, aggregate figures do not capture job creation in adjacent roles, and in the case of AI, these might include roles around data governance, model oversight, prompt engineering, and AI-enabled service development, many of which would be new roles.

Interpreting the expectation gap

The study also compares executive expectations with those of workers. Researchers fielded parallel questions to US employees through the Survey of Working Arrangements and Attitudes. Employees expect AI to increase employment at their firms by 0.5% over the next three years, while US executives expect a 1.2% reduction. Employees foresee productivity gains of 0.92%, below the executive forecast of 2.25%.

This divergence reflects different vantage points. Executives observe cost structures and competitive pressure, while employees experience task-level augmentation and new capabilities. In practice, AI systems are often deployed to assist rather than replace, particularly in knowledge-intensive work. Evidence from controlled trials, including large language model use in customer support and professional services, shows productivity gains concentrated among less experienced staff, with quality improvements appearing alongside better output figures. Where communication and training are clear, adoption tends to proceed with limited resistance.

Why this AI impact data merits attention

Survey design influences inferences from any statistics, and in this particular case, the researchers noted variation between their own figures and those from, for example, a McKinsey survey taken in the same period that put adoption at 88% of organisations (the survey in question here pegs the figure at just 69%). On the other hand, the US Census Business Trends and Outlook Survey, which draws on a broader respondent base, estimated AI use at around 9% in early 2024, rising to 18% by December 2025. This gap reflects differences in sampling, question framing and respondent seniority. Executive surveys tend to capture intent and enterprise-level deployments, while broader business surveys may reflect narrower definitions of AI or earlier stages of implementation.

In the study in question, respondents were phone-verified, unpaid, and predominantly CEOs and CFOs, with over 90% drawn from the UK and Germany. The data was cross-checked against ten years of macro output and employment figures from national statistics agencies.

The inflection point executives anticipate may unfold over the next three years as deployments mature and integration improves, in the way that many new technologies have emerged into the workplace until they become everyday tools. The central question is less whether AI will affect productivity and employment, and more how quickly organisations can change the technology’s wider adoption into measurable economic gains.

See also: OpenAI’s enterprise push: The hidden story behind AI’s sales race

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post AI: Executives’ optimism about the future appeared first on AI News.

Corporate finance departments face pressure from market volatility, regulatory demands, and digital finance requirements. Ashish Kumar, head of Infosys Oracle Sales for North America, and CM Grover, CEO of IBS FinTech, recently discussed the realities of corporate treasuries.

IBS FinTech has operated for 19 years and currently ranks in the top five globally according to an IDC report. Grover notes that while AI-powered automation has reached many areas of corporate life, treasury departments often still rely on manual spreadsheets.

“IBS FinTech has identified the gap in the CFO’s office in corporations where they are managing their most critical information system, that is, treasury management on Excel,” Grover said.

Treasury teams manage cash, liquidity, and risk. Companies face foreign currency risk through imports and exports, alongside related commodity risks. Cash surplus companies also need to invest in operations to generate returns.

The key problem for many enterprises is a lack of real-time data connection. Teams often execute trades on platforms like Bloomberg, Reuters, or 360D, manually enter the data into spreadsheets, and then post accounting entries into an enterprise resource planning system.

Successfully implementing AI in enterprise treasury management

AI implementations in finance depend on resolving these manual bottlenecks. Enterprise leaders often view the technology as a fast solution, but the technology requires digitised and automated data as a foundation.

“It is not by talking you can do AI in treasury,” Grover said. “You have to create that underlying data set that has to be digitised and automated.”

Integrating treasury management systems with existing enterprise resource planning platforms allows companies to establish this data foundation. IBS FinTech built its backend on Oracle databases from its inception and now integrates with Oracle Cloud, NetSuite, and Fusion.

A connected ecosystem requires the treasury management system to communicate directly with the enterprise resource planning platform, trading platforms, and banks. This integration provides executives with accurate information to manage liquidity, mitigate risk, and monitor compliance violations across the system.

Grover expects global volatility to increase due to geopolitical and economic factors impacting commodities, equities, and foreign exchange. Executives must prioritise automation and real-time information systems to operate in this uncertain environment.

Kumar noted that modernising treasury management with AI and connecting it to enterprise resource planning systems builds financial resilience. Enterprise leaders should audit their existing data workflows. If a finance team relies on manual entry between a trading platform and an enterprise resource planning platform, AI initiatives will fail due to poor data quality.

Implementing direct integrations ensures data flows in real time without error, providing the necessary baseline for future technology deployment.

See also: DBS pilots system that lets AI agents make payments for customers

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post How AI upgrades enterprise treasury management appeared first on AI News.

While early adoption centred on content generation and efficiency in isolated workflows, the current requirement is to industrialise these capabilities. The objective is to create systems where AI agents do not merely assist human operators, but actively run processes within strict governance frameworks.

This transition presents specific architectural and cultural challenges. It requires a move from disparate tools to joined-up systems that manage data signals, decision logic, and execution layers simultaneously.

Financial institutions integrate agentic AI workflows

The primary bottleneck in scaling AI within financial services is no longer the availability of models or creative application, it is coordination. Marketing and customer experience teams often struggle to convert decisions into action due to friction between legacy systems, compliance approvals, and data silos.

Saachin Bhatt, Co-Founder and COO at Brdge, notes the distinction between current tools and future requirements: “An assistant helps you write faster. A copilot helps teams move faster. Agents run processes.”

For enterprise architects, this means building what Bhatt terms a ‘Moments Engine’. This operating model functions through five distinct stages:

• Signals: Detecting real-time events in the customer journey.

• Decisions: Determining the appropriate algorithmic response.

• Message: Generating communication aligned with brand parameters.

• Routing: Automated triage to determine if human approval is required.

• Action and learning: Deployment and feedback loop integration.

Most organisations possess components of this architecture but lack the integration to make it function as a unified system. The technical goal is to reduce the friction that slows down customer interactions. This involves creating pipelines where data flows seamlessly from signal detection to execution, minimising latency while maintaining security.

Governance as infrastructure

In high-stakes environments like banking and insurance, speed cannot come at the cost of control. Trust remains the primary commercial asset. Consequently, governance must be treated as a technical feature rather than a bureaucratic hurdle.

The integration of AI into financial decision-making requires “guardrails” that are hard-coded into the system. This ensures that while AI agents can execute tasks autonomously, they operate within pre-defined risk parameters.

Farhad Divecha, Group CEO at Accuracast, suggests that creative optimisation must become a continuous loop where data-led insights feed innovation. However, this loop requires rigorous quality assurance workflows to ensure output never compromises brand integrity.

For technical teams, this implies a shift in how compliance is handled. Rather than a final check, regulatory requirements must be embedded into the prompt engineering and model fine-tuning stages.

“Legitimate interest is interesting, but it’s also where a lot of companies could trip up,” observes Jonathan Bowyer, former Marketing Director at Lloyds Banking Group. He argues that regulations like Consumer Duty help by forcing an outcome-based approach.

Technical leaders must work with risk teams to ensure AI-driven activity attests to brand values. This includes transparency protocols. Customers should know when they are interacting with an AI, and systems must provide a clear escalation path to human operators.

Data architecture for restraint

A common failure mode in personalisation engines is over-engagement. The technical capability to message a customer exists, but the logic to determine restraint is often missing. Effective personalisation relies on anticipation (i.e. knowing when to remain silent is as important as knowing when to speak.)

Jonathan Bowyer points out that personalisation has moved to anticipation. “Customers now expect brands to know when not to speak to them as opposed to when to speak to them.”

This requires a data architecture capable of cross-referencing customer context across multiple channels – including branches, apps, and contact centres – in real-time. If a customer is in financial distress, a marketing algorithm pushing a loan product creates a disconnect that erodes trust. The system must be capable of detecting negative signals and suppressing standard promotional workflows.

“The thing that kills trust is when you go to one channel and then move to another and have to answer the same questions all over again,” says Bowyer. Solving this requires unifying data stores so that the “memory” of the institution is accessible to every agent (whether digital or human) at the point of interaction.

The rise of generative search and SEO

In the age of AI, the discovery layer for financial products is changing. Traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) focused on driving traffic to owned properties. The emergence of AI-generated answers means that brand visibility now occurs off-site, within the interface of an LLM or AI search tool.

“Digital PR and off-site SEO is returning to focus because generative AI answers are not confined to content pulled directly from a company’s website,” notes Divecha.

For CIOs and CDOs, this changes how information is structured and published. Technical SEO must evolve to ensure that the data fed into large language models is accurate and compliant. 

Organisations that can confidently distribute high-quality information across the wider ecosystem gain reach without sacrificing control. This area, often termed ‘Generative Engine Optimisation’ (GEO), requires a technical strategy to ensure the brand is recommended and cited correctly by third-party AI agents.

Structured agility

There is a misconception that agility equates to a lack of structure. In regulated industries, the opposite is true.

Agile methodologies require strict frameworks to function safely. Ingrid Sierra, Brand and Marketing Director at Zego, explains: “There’s often confusion between agility and chaos. Calling something ‘agile’ doesn’t make it okay for everything to be improvised and unstructured.”

For technical leadership, this means systemising predictable work to create capacity for experimentation. It involves creating safe sandboxes where teams can test new AI agents or data models without risking production stability.

Agility starts with mindset, requiring staff who are willing to experiment. However, this experimentation must be deliberate. It requires collaboration between technical, marketing, and legal teams from the outset.

This “compliance-by-design” approach allows for faster iteration because the parameters of safety are established before the code is written.

What’s next for AI in the financial sector?

Looking further ahead, the financial ecosystem will likely see direct interaction between AI agents acting on behalf of consumers and agents acting for institutions.

Melanie Lazarus, Ecosystem Engagement Director at Open Banking, warns: “We are entering a world where AI agents interact with each other, and that changes the foundations of consent, authentication, and authorisation.”

Tech leaders must begin architecting frameworks that protect customers in this agent-to-agent reality. This involves new protocols for identity verification and API security to ensure that an automated financial advisor acting for a client can securely interact with a bank’s infrastructure.

The mandate for 2026 is to turn the potential of AI into a reliable P&L driver. This requires a focus on infrastructure over hype and leaders must prioritise:

• Unifying data streams: Ensure signals from all channels feed into a central decision engine to enable context-aware actions.

• Hard-coding governance: Embed compliance rules into the AI workflow to allow for safe automation.

• Agentic orchestration: Move beyond chatbots to agents that can execute end-to-end processes.

• Generative optimisation: Structure public data to be readable and prioritised by external AI search engines.

Success will depend on how well these technical elements are integrated with human oversight. The winning organisations will be those that use AI automation to enhance, rather than replace, the judgment that is especially required in sectors like financial services.

A handbook from Accuracast for CMOs is available here (registration required)

See also: Goldman Sachs deploys Anthropic systems with success

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post How financial institutions are embedding AI decision-making appeared first on AI News.

While general AI projects saw return on investment rise to 67 percent last year, autonomous agents delivered an average ROI of 80 percent by handling complex processes without human intervention. This performance gap demands a change in how CIOs allocate automation budgets.

Agentic AI systems are now advancing the enterprise from theoretical value to hard returns. Unlike generative tools that summarise data or draft text, these agents execute workflows within strict rules and approval thresholds.

Boardroom pressure drives this pivot. A report by Basware and FT Longitude finds nearly half of CFOs face demands from leadership to implement AI across their operations. Yet 61 percent of finance leaders admit their organisations rolled out custom-developed AI agents largely as experiments to test capabilities rather than to solve business problems.

These experiments often fail to pay off. Traditional AI models generate insights or predictions that require human interpretation. Agentic systems close the gap between insight and action by embedding decisions directly into the workflow.

Jason Kurtz, CEO of Basware, explains that patience for unstructured experimentation is running low. “We’ve reached a tipping point where boards and CEOs are done with AI experiments and expecting real results,” he says. “AI for AI’s sake is a waste.”

Accounts payable as the proving ground for agentic AI in finance

Finance departments now direct these agents toward high-volume, rules-based environments. Accounts payable (AP) is the primary use case, with 72 percent of finance leaders viewing it as the obvious starting point. The process fits agentic deployment because it involves structured data: invoices enter, require cleaning and compliance checks, and result in a payment booking.

Teams use agents to automate invoice capture and data entry, a daily task for 20 percent of leaders. Other live deployments include detecting duplicate invoices, identifying fraud, and reducing overpayments. These are not hypothetical applications; they represent tasks where an algorithm functions with high autonomy when parameters are correct.

Success in this sector relies on data quality. Basware trains its systems on a dataset of more than two billion processed invoices to deliver context-aware predictions. This structured data allows the system to differentiate between legitimate anomalies and errors without human oversight.

Kevin Kamau, Director of Product Management for Data and AI at Basware, describes AP as a “proving ground” because it combines scale, control, and accountability in a way few other finance processes can.

The build versus buy decision matrix

Technology leaders must next decide how to procure these capabilities. The term “agent” currently covers everything from simple workflow scripts to complex autonomous systems, which complicates procurement.

Approaches split by function. In accounts payable, 32 percent of finance leaders prefer agentic AI embedded in existing software, compared to 20 percent who build them in-house. For financial planning and analysis (FP&A), 35 percent opt for self-built solutions versus 29 percent for embedded ones.

This divergence suggests a pragmatic rule for the C-suite. If the AI improves a process shared across many organisations, such as AP, embedding it via a vendor solution makes sense. If the AI creates a competitive advantage unique to the business, building in-house is the better path. Leaders should buy to accelerate standard processes and build to differentiate.

Governance as an enabler of speed

Fear of autonomous error slows adoption. Almost half of finance leaders (46%) will not consider deploying an agent without clear governance. This caution is rational; autonomous systems require strict guardrails to operate safely in regulated environments.

Yet the most successful organisations do not let governance stop deployment. Instead, they use it to scale. These leaders are significantly more likely to use agents for complex tasks like compliance checks (50%) compared to their less confident peers (6%).

Anssi Ruokonen, Head of Data and AI at Basware, advises treating AI agents like junior colleagues. The system requires trust but should not make large decisions immediately. He suggests testing thoroughly and introducing autonomy slowly, ensuring a human remains in the loop to maintain responsibility.

Digital workers raise concerns regarding displacement. A third of finance leaders believe job displacement is already happening. Proponents argue agents shift the nature of work rather than eliminating it.

Automating manual tasks such as information extraction from PDFs frees staff to focus on higher-value activities. The goal is to move from task efficiency to operating leverage, allowing finance teams to manage faster closes and make better liquidity decisions without increasing headcount.

Organisations that use agentic AI extensively report higher returns. Leaders who deploy agentic AI tools daily for tasks like accounts payable achieve better outcomes than those who limit usage to experimentation. Confidence grows through controlled exposure; successful small-scale deployments lead to broader operational trust and increased ROI.

Executives must move beyond unguided experimentation to replicate the success of early adopters. Data shows that 71 percent of finance teams with weak returns acted under pressure without clear direction, compared to only 13 percent of teams achieving strong ROI.

Success requires embedding AI directly into workflows and governing agents with the discipline applied to human employees. “Agentic AI can deliver transformational results, but only when it is deployed with purpose and discipline,” concludes Kurtz.

See also: AI deployment in financial services hits an inflection point as Singapore leads the shift to production

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Agentic AI drives finance ROI in accounts payable automation appeared first on AI News.

That shift is visible in how large employers are rethinking workforce systems. The telecommunications group e& began moving its human resources operations to what it describes as an AI-first model, covering roughly 10,000 employees across its organisation. The transition is built on Oracle Fusion Cloud Human Capital Management (HCM), running in an Oracle Cloud Infrastructure dedicated region. Details of the deployment were outlined in a recent Oracle announcement.

The change is less about introducing a single AI feature and more about restructuring how HR processes are handled. Automated and AI-driven tools are expected to help HR departments with recruitment screening, interview coordination, and employee learning recommendations. The stated goal is to standardise processes across regions and provide managers with faster access to workforce data and insights.

HR as an enterprise AI proving ground

From an enterprise perspective, HR is a logical entry point. Many HR tasks follow repeatable patterns: candidate matching, onboarding documentation, leave management, and training assignments. These workflows produce consistent data trails, which makes them easier to model and automate than loosely defined knowledge work. Moving such functions onto AI-supported systems allows organisations to test reliability, governance, and user acceptance in a controlled environment before expanding into more sensitive areas.

The infrastructure choice also indicates how enterprises are balancing innovation with compliance. Oracle claims that the system is deployed in a dedicated cloud region designed to address data sovereignty and regulatory requirements. For multinational corporations, workforce data sits at the intersection of privacy law, employment regulation, and corporate governance. Running AI tools in a controlled environment is part of how companies are trying to contain risk while experimenting with automation.

Governance, compliance, and internal risk management

The e& rollout reflects a broader pattern in enterprise AI adoption: internal transformation is often more achievable than external disruption. Customer-facing AI systems attract attention, but they introduce reputational and operational risk if they fail. HR platforms, by contrast, operate behind the scenes. Errors can still carry consequences, yet they are easier to monitor, audit, and correct within existing governance structures.

Industry research supports the idea that internal operations are becoming a primary testing ground. Deloitte’s 2026 State of AI in the Enterprise report found that organisations are increasingly shifting AI projects from pilot stages into production environments, with productivity and workflow automation cited as early areas of return. The report is based on a survey of more than 3,000 senior leaders involved in AI initiatives, including respondents in Southeast Asia. While the study spans multiple business functions, administrative and operational processes were repeatedly identified as practical entry points for scaled deployment.

Workforce systems also provide a natural setting for AI agents and assistants. HR teams handle frequent employee queries about policies, benefits, and training options. Embedding conversational tools into these workflows may reduce manual workload while giving employees faster access to information. According to Oracle’s description of the deployment, e& plans to introduce digital assistants designed to support candidate engagement and employee development tasks. Whether such tools deliver consistent value will depend on accuracy, oversight, and how well they integrate with existing HR processes.

Scaling AI inside the organisation

The lesson is not that HR automation is new, but that AI is changing the scope of what can be automated. Traditional HR software focused on record-keeping and workflow management. AI layers add predictive matching, pattern analysis, and decision support. That expansion raises familiar governance questions: data quality, bias, auditability, and employee trust.

There is also a workforce dimension. Automating parts of HR does not eliminate the need for human oversight; it changes where effort is concentrated. HR professionals may spend less time on routine coordination and more on policy interpretation, employee engagement, and exception handling. Enterprises adopting AI-driven systems will need clear escalation paths and review processes to avoid over-reliance on automated outputs.

What makes the current moment different is scale. Deployments that cover thousands of employees turn AI from an experiment into operational infrastructure. They force organisations to confront issues of reliability, training, and change management in real time. The systems must work consistently across jurisdictions, languages, and regulatory frameworks.

As enterprises look for low-risk entry points into AI, workforce operations are likely to remain high on the list. They combine structured data, repeatable workflows, and measurable outcomes — conditions that suit automation while still allowing room for human judgement. The experience of early adopters will shape how quickly other internal functions, from finance to procurement, follow a similar path.

(Photo by Zulfugar Karimov)

See also: Barclays bets on AI to cut costs and boost returns

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check outAI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events, clickhere for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post How e& is using HR to bring AI into enterprise operations appeared first on AI News.